On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 17:57:14 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
Before even contemplating a big disrupting language split like
proposed by the OP, wouldn't it first more appropriate to write
a nice article, DIP, blog, whatever, listing the defects of the
current language that can not be solved by progressive
evolution?
I haven't the impression that the *language* itself suffer from
so big flaws that it would warrant to fork it in a way that
will lead to a lot frustration and bewilderment.
D is not perfect, no question, but it is not in a state that
would jusrify such a harsh approach.
+1
Does anyone currently maintain somewhere such a list of
not-gonna-be-fixed-in-D2 defects?
This might provide more solid grounds to this discussion.
