Sebastien Alaiwan wrote:
My point precisely was that "not splitting D1/D2" might correspond to "doing things right".
"not splitting" here means "we're stuck with D1". deprecation cycle of several years (not counting the time required to actually *start* the process) means "no evolution".
i must make myself clear here, i guess: i value "good language" way more than "stable language". i absolutely don't mind fixing my code if it makes it better/more clear/etc. while it's hard to sell "constantly evolving" language to Big Enterprise Wheels, not making breaking changes means cloning worst C++ feature. ;-)
