Re: foreach range with index

[Luís Marques via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 02:54:30 UTC, 9il wrote:
Random access iteration is more expensive then front/popFront 
in general case.
For arrays it is not true. But for many other kinds of ranges 
it is. For example ranges that do not have contiguous memory 
representation (strided vectors, flattened matrixes and etc)

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. I was suggesting 
that foreach(range) would iterate range[0...length] in that 
order. Wouldn't that be an equivalent access pattern to 
front/popFront?