Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:00:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:

The out contract looks pretty good actually. The in contract, 
not as good. That looks like a comma expression. I'd rather see 
this be:

     in(x > 0)
     in(y > 0)

or

     in(x > 0 && y > 0)

In this case, we have something I think I would support.

-Steve

I agree.