On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 14:09:40 UTC, Enamex wrote:
It has the already used `typeof(return)` going for it, though.
That's why I had suggested it above. However, I think the point they raised about parsing in response was a good one.
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 14:09:40 UTC, Enamex wrote:
It has the already used `typeof(return)` going for it, though.
That's why I had suggested it above. However, I think the point they raised about parsing in response was a good one.