On 02.09.2017 01:37, Q. Schroll wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 23:13:50 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
[..]
Just as Scott Meyers said: make it easy to use correctly and hard to
use incorrectly. Today it's easy to use incorrectly.
While
enum foo = [1,2,3];
assert(foo is foo);
fails,
enum bla = "123";
assert(foo is foo);
passes.
Enhancement request submitted:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17799
Unfortunately after I found out the second one does not have to do with
mutability. Making foo immutable(int)[] does not change anything. It
only works for const(char)[], immutable(char)[], and probably w/dchar
friends. That's odd.
This is called string pooling. This passed too:
void main(){
assert("123" is "123");
}
D (at least sometimes) allows the identities of different immutable
locations to become conflated.
