It seems that pure and nothrow are attributes, just like @safe. (By contrast, you can overload functions based on const and immutable). Should the names be changed?
- Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ? Don
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ? Denis Koroskin
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ? Walter Bright
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow... bearophile
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @not... Denis Koroskin
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure... Don
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @... Denis Koroskin
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @... Danny Wilson
- Re: Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ? dsimcha