Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:18:05 +0300, Don <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
It seems that pure and nothrow are attributes, just like @safe.
(By contrast, you can overload functions based on const and immutable).
Should the names be changed?
I agree. I also believe there should be @naked (it's somewhat
unintuitive that asm { naked; } anywhere withing function body makes it
naked).
Naked is not an externally visible attribute of a function, signature or
type, it only concerns the internals. Therefore, it shouldn't be an
attribute.
