On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 12:41:57 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 12:08:45 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 09/20/2017 07:49 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:59:56 Per Nordlöw via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 09:13:52 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12625
- Jonathan M Davis
Looks like we should we wait for
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7110 to be merged before
adding
`s` to druntime.
It also should have a much more descriptive name (e.g.
staticArray, though
maybe that's a bit long), and I think that std.array really
does make more
sense than object.d. object.d is for stuff that's essentially
built-in, not
for helper functions.
Agreed. Also: the length of the name should not be a problem,
this is not a frequently used facility. -- Andrei
I do strongly disagree with this approach, rather we should
type array literals as static arrays by default and rely on
implicit conversion to slices.
A long time ago I believe this was the case, but it was changed
because it caused a lot of problems. What they were I don't know.
