On 9/22/17 3:55 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:58:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 21.09.2017 12:33, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 18:41:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Can that be done without breakages? -- Andrei
No.
Are thinking about
typeof([1,2])
changing from
int[]
to
int[2]
?
Yes, and everything that entails, for example:
auto x = [1,2];
x ~= 3; // goes from ok to `error: cannot append int to int[2]`.
Ok, breaks code, but I like it. Much better than the current behaviour.
Don't fall in love with it. It's not going to happen, as this would be
too much breakage for almost no gain.
Much as I want a way to statically infer a static array size, this is
not the answer.
-Steve
