techempower bench is not good. It is wierd. On my pc vibe.d is much faster with techempower benchmark. So I do not beleive their results
Dne 15. 10. 2017 12:10 odpoledne napsal uživatel "Ecstatic Coder via Digitalmars-d" <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>: If the GC issue can not be tackled and even with the recent communication > blogs, it still keeps showing up. Is it maybe not better to focus the > marketing features that other developers ( none C++ ) may see as advantages > and slow draw then in? High performance web development package for > instance. Vibe.d does not count because has not been seen giving any > descent public performance in years ( like techempower or other sites ). > At the moment, for very demanding high-performance web applications, the main choices are : - Dart - Go - C/C++ - Java/Kotlin This is somewhat confirmed by the following benchmark (despite its well known flaws) : https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=query I think that D, with its fiber system and extreme execution speeds, should already have everything needed to compete on the same grounds as Dart and Go. But only if : - the fibers automatically uses all cores if allowed to do so; - the GC problems is designed so that the server never hangs for more than a few milliseconds IN THE WORST CASE (progressive GC) - dedicated HIGH PERFORMANCE web server (cfr Go/Dart) and database access (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Aerospike) libraries are available, preferably as a standard library (like in Dart and Go). And for the third point, I really mean high performance, something that make D's implementation of the (silly) benchmarks immediately go to the top of the chart. If all that is already available, perfect :) Then we just need to add the D version of the benchmarks, and the marketing is done. And moreover I'd be delighted to start using D instead of Go for my next web server developments.
