On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 14:54 -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] > That's right. C++ is based on faith in the programmer using best > practices. D is > not based on faith, it can be automatically checked.
"Can be" is not the same as "is". Perhaps all D compilers should enforce the "can be" as "is", with options to switch it off if need be? This is the route Rust is going, and it has great benefits exactly because C and C++ do not do this. -- Russel. ========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
