On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 16:59:41 UTC, aberba wrote:
In this video[1] from 2016, developer talks about C++ memory
safety features, meta-programming, maturity and few others as
main reasons they choose it for developing their blockchain
software (the way I got it from a quick view).
Besides, D maturity (which I can't confirm or deny), what else
does D miss to be considered a better alternative for
blockchain in 2018?
D is also more productive, has safety and unittest built-in.
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4jq4frE5v4
The better question is whether blockchain is worth implementing
in D? ;) It wastes a ton of energy with the most common
proof-of-work approach and, as I've pointed out here before,
there are better ways to do it:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/bitcoins-insane-energy-consumption-explained/
http://forum.dlang.org/post/xzuzvykrqouqlsjmk...@forum.dlang.org
But some decentralized approach, if not blockchain, is
undoubtedly going to be a huge winner, and of course D would be a
great language with which to build it. The lead developer of
Bitcoin Cash, currently the fourth-most valuable cryptocurrency
(https://coinmarketcap.com), gave a talk on doing crypto in D at
the last DConf:
http://dconf.org/2017/talks/sechet.html
I don't think he's using D since they forked the Bitcoin source
though.
