On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 10:49:49 UTC, Dgame wrote:
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 10:40:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
However, Rust won't fare well in a head-to-head comparison
either, because of the issues with back-pointers.
Could you explain this?
You often want back-pointers for performance reasons, but Rust
default pointer model isn't as accepting to cycles. So you either
have to change your design or loose the benefits that the
compiler provides, at which point C++ is more convenient, but it
depends on what you try to do.
