Walter Bright, el 1 de diciembre a las 11:17 me escribiste: > Leandro Lucarella wrote: > >Walter Bright, el 28 de noviembre a las 13:31 me escribiste: > >>retard wrote: > >>>Is this again one of those features that is supposed to hide the > >>>fact that dmd & optlink toolchain sucks? At least gcc can optimize > >>>the calls in most cases where the operator is defined to be > >>>virtual, but is used in non-polymorphic manner. > >>The gnu linker (ld) does not do any optimizations of virtual call => > >>direct call. Optlink has nothing to do with it. > > > >The *new* GNU Linker (gold) does (with plug-ins, both GCC and LLVM > >provides plug-ins for gold to do LTO). > > > >See: > >http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization > >http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html > > I don't see that particular one in the links.
Well, I was talking about link-time optimization in general, not virtual call elimination in particular :). I don't know exactly what kind of optimizations are supported currently, but bare in mind this is all very new (Gold and the LTO plug-ins)... -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Que hacés, ratita? - Espero un ratito...
