On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:49:46PM +0000, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 21:43:45 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> > Thats not completly true, last time I tried some of best c++ version
> > from http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/. I was able to write
> > much idiomatic D code which was faster than c++ witch use some
> > specific libraries and so on. So my experience is that D is same or
> > faster than C++
>
> I'm not thinking about those. I'm thinking about supported tooling
> that makes you more productive when writing code with high throughput.
That's not what the article says. The article says, and I quote:
C++’s enormous performance advantage (extremely efficient native
code)
Meaning, the "enormous performance advantage" is because of "extremely
eefficient native code". I don't argue that C++ has extremely efficient
native code. But so has D. So the claim that C++ has an "enormous
performance advantage" over D is specious.
T
--
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character,
give him power. -- Abraham Lincoln
