On Sunday, 4 February 2018 at 11:14:43 UTC, JN wrote:
On Friday, 2 February 2018 at 15:06:35 UTC, Benny wrote:
You want to produce PDFs? fpdf 2015-Apr-06, a very limited PDF generation tool last updated 3 years go.


While not as trivial as just using a dub package, D easy interop with C means you can use C libraries for PDF like libharu or w/e.

* Are you targeting C developers?

Sure BetterC is a way towards that but again, what do you offer more then Rust? I see C developers more going for Rust then D on this point. Or hell even Zig or Jai or whatever 3 letter flavor of the month language.


The problem with flavor of the month languages is that people switch to them, play with them for a bit and abandon them. To quote Bjarne Stroustrup: "There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses". Languages like D or Java fall into the "get stuff done" category. They don't try to reinvent programming, they don't use the latest abstract higher order category theory union type lambdas, so they are considered boring by the language-hoppers. That's not a flaw of the language.

Personally I agree that BetterC isn't a good alternative for C programmers. Sure, you get some benefits of D, but you will lose many benefits of C and you'll have to constantly fight "wait, can I use this in BetterC or not" kind of thing.

What is the specific purpose of -betterC? I see from <https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html> that it's (A) useful when targeting constrained environments, and (B) for easier embedding of D libraries into larger projects. But I think I've read elsewhere in this forum that it was specifically useful for the DMD implementation itself.

Is betterC intended to be used for standalone "D -betterC" programs where C might've otherwise been used? My impression of D so far is that it can indeed already be used as a better C by avoiding the GC yourself, or invoking it yourself when appropriate.

It may be useful if that betterc.html page gave a rationale for it; to avoid any confusion on what its intended purpose is.

Reply via email to