On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:56:27 UTC, Henrik wrote:
why do I have to put the @nogc on the constructor and
destructor separately?
You can make things slightly better by putting @nogc in the
struct itself:
struct S
{
@nogc:
void member1()
{
}
void member2()
{
}
}
But, yeah, this is a current pain point: attributes aren't
"deep". Maybe one day we'll have a syntax for applying
attributes recursively, but I think it's blocking on the lack of
a syntax for inverting an attribute. (I.e., a way to declare an
impure/gc/whatever thing inside a region that's declared
pure/nogc/whatever.)
