On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 05:00:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
My goal in the short term is that Phobos is going to compile successfully with dip1000 the way it is now. It has already been deferred and deferred and deferred.
I understand that, and while you're doing that I can begin implementing the PRs to deprecate `in` or change its definition to `scope const`, or something else.
Nothing I'm proposing will, in any way, interfere with what you're doing in Phobos. I just want a decision about what we're going to do with `in`. I'll do the leg work.
Mike
