Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:01:34 +0100, downs wrote: > including such gems as incorrect > tuple lengths, incorrect tuple slices, endless errors without line > numbers, spurious template instantiation errors with nonsensical > parameters, and at least one case where T[0] evaluated to T, > necessitating the workaround Tuple!(T[0])[0], it felt appropriate.
Why are these needed? Because of compiler bugs?
