retard wrote: > Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:01:34 +0100, downs wrote: > >> including such gems as incorrect >> tuple lengths, incorrect tuple slices, endless errors without line >> numbers, spurious template instantiation errors with nonsensical >> parameters, and at least one case where T[0] evaluated to T, >> necessitating the workaround Tuple!(T[0])[0], it felt appropriate. > > Why are these needed? Because of compiler bugs?
Apparently, in certain very specific corner cases, my version of GDC believes that when I say "T[0]", I really mean "T". In that case, "Tuple!(T[0])[0]" is like saying "really very the first element". :)