Bill Baxter Wrote: > Hmm. And Go qualifies because it has some CSP implementation built in? > Or is it more because it has a billion-dollar company built in? Kinda > makes you wonder. > > --bb
Yeah, and if you look at the "Alternatives" to C++ on this page, C and Go are mentioned, but not D because of some bias. http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/
