On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 15:25:10 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 15:14:19 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
BTW: Multiple alias this is still planned for inclusion in D,
right? If so, what would be the (pratical?) difference between
having copy ctors with such a relaxed type requirement and just
defining an equivalent alias this method? In case the answer is
that there's no significant difference, why not drop multiple
alias this, then?
Sorry for the stream-of-conscience type posts. But, to clarify
further: if alias this provides access to the members of the
converted type (besides type conversion), couldn't that feature
be folded into the same mechanism of the copy ctor (or
vice-versa), to avoid mostly redundant features in the language,
with subtle interactions?
