On 07/12/2018 11:29 AM, Luís Marques wrote:
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 15:25:10 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 15:14:19 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
BTW: Multiple alias this is still planned for inclusion in D, right?
If so, what would be the (pratical?) difference between having copy
ctors with such a relaxed type requirement and just defining an
equivalent alias this method? In case the answer is that there's no
significant difference, why not drop multiple alias this, then?
Sorry for the stream-of-conscience type posts. But, to clarify further:
if alias this provides access to the members of the converted type
(besides type conversion), couldn't that feature be folded into the same
mechanism of the copy ctor (or vice-versa), to avoid mostly redundant
features in the language, with subtle interactions?
The DIP mentions the interaction of @implicit with alias this.
