On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 10:48:40 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 16:26:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
What's your take on this?
Option 2 won't necessarily cause problems with named funcion
arguments: The names of the constructor arguments and members
are different anyway, at least usually, letting the compiler to
infer the intended call by them.
But there might be some corner cases where this would not
apply. Do you see any?
That argument sounds quite dangerous to me, especially since my
experience is on the contrary that constructor arguments are
often named the same as the attribute they refer to. And what of
mixed cases? I really wouldn't rely on anything like naming
conventions for something like that.
