On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 18:31:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 16:57:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:26:42PM +0000, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote:
tl;dr: the currently proposed syntax options are:
---
struct S
{
    int a = 2, b = 4, c = 6;
}
void foo()
{
    bar(S({c: 10})); // Option 1
    bar(S(c: 10));   // Option 2
    bar(S{c: 10});   // Option 3
}

...

Seeing as we already have

S s = { c : 10 };

I'd say it would be fairer to say it resembles anonymous function syntax and AA initialisation syntax, but mostly it resembles the existing struct initialisation syntax.

Not sure about this, but wouldn't

    bar({c: 10});

be consistent with

   S s = { c : 10 };

?

Reply via email to