On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 05:01:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/25/2018 5:42 AM, Chris M. wrote:
What about my other point then on the syntax? I think
something similar to what I suggested would be a much more
flexible solution and is worth considering.
Much more work would be needed to make that a proposal.
Here's some more details that could help with considering it
incase you didn't see it:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/uxloaftaptfbzhbhq...@forum.dlang.org
Seems like it's a super set of return and the current proposal to
(from what I can understand at least) make some parameters act
like a sink in some situations when a function's return value is
of a specific type and the parameters are annotated with some
convention?
Cheers,
- Ali
