On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 04:45, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 17:34:17 UTC, ShadoLight wrote: > > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 13:11:18 UTC, Jonathan M > > Davis wrote: > > > > It anyway appears that Vim/Emacs are often extended by plugins, > > and this will be the only way to have some project manage > > features. > > I'm an Emacs user. I have never needed project management > features. If I want to edit a new file, I do that. > > You might be confusing "project management" with a build system. > I'm not sure, but then I just use a build system such as CMake. > > > I maintain that it is not practical trying to duplicate this in > > your editor of choice except if the amount of time you will > > save (from increased productivity) exceed the time taken to do > > this. I maintain that for bug fixing/support in a big > > organization this will hardly ever be the case. > > True, but why would anyone want to duplicate it? The only reason > I can think of is if the team is using Visual Studio and the .sln > file is the agreed-upon build system. I know this happens in real > life, but it shouldn't. And even then... open VS, add a file, go > back to editing in Emacs/vim/whathaveyou. Or edit the XML > directly.
Or use glob's in the XML.