"Andrei Alexandrescu" <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote in message news:hl9end$1u8...@digitalmars.com... > > Second, the whole new anonymous class thing is for Java's sake. Do you > think we need to keep all that? >
It doesn't bother me having it, but I can't say I can imagine ever having a use for it outside a fully dynamic scripting language (or maybe Java, but well, Java tools and features tend to be useful primarily as workarounds for Java being it's usual Javay self). > > new T[length] > new T(initializerlist) Isn't that exactly what we already have? > new(addr) T[length] > new(addr) T(initializerlist) > I'm not sure I see the point of that. Can't you just call the ctor directly?
