Nick Sabalausky: > As long as we're bikeshedding on type names, "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things" ^_^
>I do find it misleading that "char" represents a code-unit while still calling >itself a "character".< The development of the BitC language has restarted, it's a system language that looks like Scheme. It's efficient. This is is the start of a small thread about unicode in BitC: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/2010-March/001812.html http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/2010-March/thread.html#1812 They agree with me that 32 bit chars can be not really true chars, so I think essentially even UFT32 is an bidirectional Range. Bye, bearophile
