"Walter Bright" <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:hrcbrr$2t7...@digitalmars.com... > Moritz Warning wrote: > >> Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter? > > I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get full > agreement by their respective devs be converted to the Boost license. The > Boost license is free of the legal problems that BSD has, and is > compatible with the Phobos license.
It looks like the Tango devs are pretty much settled on BSD-only with some hack to get around the binary attribution thing: http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/1701 (*Shrug*, well, at least it's not as insanely verbose and impenetrable as Apache 2.0...) I *hate* licenses...(That's why I use the zlib one, none of the public domain problems, all of the freedoms that I've been told Boost offers, and none of Boost's idiotic over-verbosity.) ------------------------------- Not sent from an iPhone.