== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article > I received a call from the Tango representative yesterday saying that some > developers expressed concern that SHOO's time library proposed submission to > Phobos may have an "infraction" of the Tango BSD license. The word > "infringement" was not used, though I think infraction and infringement mean > the > same thing here. > He expressed the idea that since SHOO was admittedly very familiar with the > Tango time code, that it was not possible for his time code to be free of > "taint" from the corresponding Tango code. He was satisfied only by my > agreement > to block the inclusion of SHOO's time module in Phobos. > The key point here is the Tango team regards it as impossible for someone > familiar with the internals of a Tango module to make a non-infringing > reimplementation of its interface.
This is worse than I imagined. So they were the bad guys all alone. Lars Ivar & comp.- shame on you for this crap. The hell with Tango. It needs to die with D1. -- Gurney Halleck
