Note: I posted this already on runtime D list, but I think that list was a
wrong one for this question. Sorry for duplication :-)
Hi. I am new to D. It looks like D supports 3 types of characters: char, wchar,
dchar. This is cool, however, I have some questions about it:
1. When we have 2 methods (one with wchar[] and another with char[]), how D
will determine which one to use if I pass a string "hello world"?
2. Many libraries (e.g. tango or phobos) don't provide functions/methods (or
have incomplete support) for wchar/dchar
e.g. writefln probably assumes char[] for strings like "Number %d..."
3. Even if they do support, it is kind of annoying to provide methods for all 3
types of chars. Especially, if we want to use native mode (e.g. for Windows
wchar is better, for Linux char is better). E.g. Windows has _wopen, _wdirent,
_wreaddir, _wopenddir, _wmain(int argc, wchar_t[] argv) and so on, and they
should be native (in a sense that no conversion is necessary when we do, for
instance, _wopen). Linux doesn't have them as UTF-8 is used widely there.
Since D language is targeted on system programming, why not to try to use
whatever works better on a particular system (e.g. char will be 2 bytes on
Windows and 1 byte on Linux; it can be a compiler switch, and all libraries can
be compiled properly on a particular system). It's still necessary to have all
3 types of char for cooperation with C. But in those cases byte, short and int
will do their work. For this kind of situation, it would be nice to have some
built-in functions for transparent conversion from char to byte/short/int and
vice versa (especially, if conversion only happens if needed on a particular
platform).
In my opinion, to separate notion of character from byte would be nice, and it
makes sense as a particular platform uses either UTF-8 or UTF-16 natively.
Programmers may write universal code (like TCHAR on Windows). Unfortunately, C
uses 'char' and 'byte' interchangeably but why D has to make this mistake again?
Sorry if my suggestion sounds odd. Anyway, it would be great to hear something
from D gurus :-)
Ruslan.
