On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:04:18 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad <pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet> wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:51:01 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

I've been trying to get a modified version of std.process to compile
(with Lars K's changes) for windows, and phobos finally compiled.

So I built a little test program, compiled it, and I get the following
error message:

object.Exception: circular dependency in module std.stdio.

Great.  How did that happen?  Being that I didn't write std.stdio, only
modified it slightly (and certainly didn't change any imports), I
haven't the foggiest where this problem is.  Given that the runtime can
prove there is a circular dependency, and apparently knows the names of
the modules, how about showing me the cycle?

:P

I do not look forward to tracking this one down...

-Steve


I think the only places that exception can be thrown are lines 1770 and
1830 of object.d.  Luckily there are a few debug(PRINTF)printf()s
nearby.  You could try building druntime with -debug=PRINTF.  When the
static constructors are run, hopefully you'll see something like

  ...
  module[x] = std.stdio
  ...
  module[y] = module.depending.cyclically.on.stdio
  module[z] = std.stdio
  object.Exception: Cyclic dependency in module std.stdio.

This is a good idea.

I'm going to look at the runtime to see if I can add code that prints the cycle only on failure. I think such code could be invaluable. I wonder if a stack trace would be enough...

-Steve

Reply via email to