On 28/07/10 05:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:and scope storage class.If scope storage class is going, we need a library equivalent. Current 'scoped' is not good due to 4500.Agreed. I know how to fix it. Andrei
I missed the previous discussions about removing the scoped storage class. Would you mind re-stating the argument here, or post a link to it?
FWIW I'm happy for delete to be removed. -- Graham St Jack
