lurker wrote:
Justin Johansson Wrote:
To what degree do the author and advocates of the D(2) Programming
Language believe that it is axiomatically pure and to what degree
to the naysayers believe that it is conversely impure. Further,
does axiomatic purity in a PL really matter?
Thanks in advance for all opinions offered.
What *is* axiomatic purity? A quick google books search returned titles like:
"Jesus remembered"
"American physics in transition: a history of conceptual change in"
"Feminism-art-theory: an anthology, 1968-2000"
"Feminism and tradition in aesthetics"
"Constructive interventions: paradigms, process and practice of .."
"Agriculture and rural connections in the Pacific, 1500-1900"
"Possessed by the past: the heritage crusade and the spoils of history"
It's safety, which requires two proofs: progress and preservation. I
found this excerpt from a book I'd recommend:
http://books.google.com/books?id=ti6zoAC9Ph8C&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=safety+%3D+progress+%2B+preservation&source=bl&ots=EzM9xEpZWD&sig=CJrn0iCMOCrBk_YF9CvXn-2GG60&hl=en&ei=nnJTTIyREoigsQPY8JXaAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=safety%20%3D%20progress%20%2B%20preservation&f=false
Andrei
