> Go back to read my post again, it doesn't contain the name "LDC".
But LDC is the D frontend for LLVM right, so wouldn't it be more useful to talk about LDC rather than LLVM?
> Go back to read my post again, it doesn't contain the name "LDC".
But LDC is the D frontend for LLVM right, so wouldn't it be more useful to talk about LDC rather than LLVM?