On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:19:02 -0400, Adam Ruppe wrote: > On 8/4/10, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am sorry to say this, but I think porting the current back-end to 64 >> bit is a waste of time because it will not be used for professional >> usages. I think LLVM will be the main back-end for professional usages >> of D2 > > Get back to me when LDC starts to actually /work/. It is *completely > unusable* in its current state and its developers don't seem to care. > > I don't understand what you see in it.
LDC for llvm 2.7 doesn't have debug support because the LDC debug info code only works for llvm 2.6. I assume that's what you call unusable? There are bugs as well, sure. But nothing too serious from what I know about. LDC is developed on a personal by need/interest basis. Atm. the original developers don't have time or much interest in LDC. It's a volunteer effort from the beginning and everyone is invited to work on ldc.
