Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:59, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-08-04 12:34, Walter Bright wrote:
Don wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
I believe D's current approach is what Java does?
I'm not sure what Java does.
I'm pretty sure that D's and Java's approach is the same.
Yes, it is the same I think.
In Java a package is considered "flat", not hierarchical. It consists
only of the classes directly contained on the package's directory. And
AFAIK sub-packages are no different than any other packages with regards
to the parent.
I updated the bug with some interesting links to Java discussions.
Seems pretty clear that the problems are with the concept itself, rather
than D's implementation of it.
