Richard Webb: > I think that bearophile suggested that references be marked as non-nullable > because making them non-nullable by default is a breaking change in the > language > (i agree that that is a better approach though).
Right. I think at this point there's no hope to non-nullable by default. But the solution in two parts that I have suggested may be good enough, I don't know. I'd like to be able to create a D2 experimental version with those changes, to try how it works in practice on few small programs. Bye, bearophile
