Juanjo Alvarez Wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:28:16 -0700, Walter Bright > <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > > be found to tout it, it will be ineffective. This is because > everyone touts > > their language as "more productive". People just see "more > productive" and their > > brain just skips over it without it even entering their conscious > thought. > > Well, in this case I don't believe that D is more productive than > Python in the short term (it could be in the long term for big > codebases involving several developers). But it is almost as > productive while smoking it in performance and resource usage. So it > is more like you have the advantages of a natively compiled language > without many of the drawbacks.
This is exactly how it should be marketed. It has the productivity of Python, other dynamic languages, with the performance and power of a natively compiled language.
