Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:45 +0200, Simen kjaeraas wrote: > retard <r...@tard.com.invalid> wrote: > >> If you don't have first class tuple constructors and define them with a >> template, that's unfortunately not structural typing. > > Might I inquire as to why?
I see these "tuples" defined with a template merely as structs in disguise. They don't cover all the cases where built-in first class tuples can be used.
