On 10/7/10 13:44 CDT, retard wrote:
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:45 +0200, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
retard<r...@tard.com.invalid> wrote:
If you don't have first class tuple constructors and define them with a
template, that's unfortunately not structural typing.
Might I inquire as to why?
I see these "tuples" defined with a template merely as structs in
disguise. They don't cover all the cases where built-in first class
tuples can be used.
Could you please take the time to put together a list of requirements?
That would be great for either making Tuple better or for improving the
language.
Andrei
