On 10/16/2010 07:50 PM, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:17:18 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
On 10/16/2010 05:57 PM, kenji hara wrote:
Current dmd does not enough support runtime reflection.
[snip]
I think runtime reflection is not needed. What you'd need to do for
the "loose duck" is generate code that throws for all interface
methods that are not present in the class. Am I wrong?
Andrei
interface ICanQuack
{
void quack() { ... }
}
class Duck
{
void quack() { .. }
}
Object o = new Duck();
Duck d = duck!(ICanQuack)(o);
d.quack(); // throw or not?
Throw... but now I see what Kenji meant. Thanks! So really there's three
levels:
- statically-enforced conformance
- statically-decided conformance
- dynamically-decided conformance
Now we have three names to find, not one :o).
Andrei
