== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article > I'm starting to > think the problem D faces with adoption is that it *doesn't* suck. If it > did, people would probably be all over it.
I know you're kidding, but ironically you may be right in a way. Sometimes D needs to realize that worse is better. For example: The discussion on arbitrary cost copy construction. It's silly to contort half of Phobos to efficiently support a paradigm that is only used in a few niche areas and is widely regarded as a questionable practice, especially outside of the C++ community.
