Michel Fortin wrote:
Remove that and you've got something that doesn't read
well and on top of that looks out of place in a D program.
The JavaBridge had lots of those functions, while it was alive:
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Legacy/JavaBridge/JavaBridge.pdf
[...]
I think a similar approach should be taken for tools that create
bindings. Which means that by default it picks the first part of the
selector as the function's name, but if you defined a custom mapping
then it'll use that instead.
Sure, I just meant that it will still look long and out of place ?
Just like it did in Java... And that's probably saying something.
(Java wasn't exactly afraid of long-widing names in the first place)
One of the old favorites was addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey
--anders
