bearophile wrote:
Anyway, the topic of this whole tread is about non-nullable types in D,

I read your first post as arguing that Spec# in general was a language well designed for security - "Spec# looks very well designed and thought out"

copying from the very good implementation of Spec# (with the little changes I
have shown).

Walter, instead of poking and teasing me as a ten year old does, why we don't
start talking about serious things?

Given the store you've set by integer overflow detection, sorry, I couldn't resist teasing you about Spec# failing at that.

Reply via email to