Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:44:58 +0300, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
To eliminate null pointers is the same as shooting the canary in your
coal mine because its twitter annoys you.
I'm tired of pointing out that NO ONE is talking about eliminating null
pointers, but rather extending an existing type system to support
non-nulls. Your hate towards non-nullables comes from misunderstanding
of the concept.
I've decided that I should stick my neck out and write up a blog post about
this. So stay tuned, armed with roses or bricks as apropos.
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... Simen kjaeraas
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... bearophile
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... retard
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... Lutger
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... retard
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... Walter Bright
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... retard
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... bearophile
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... tls
- Re: Spec#, nullables and m... Simen kjaeraas
- Re: Spec#, nullables and more Walter Bright
- Re: Spec#, nullables and more Walter Bright
- Re: Spec#, nullables and more bearophile
- Re: Spec#, nullables and more bearophile
- Re: Spec#, nullables and more bearophile
-