Brad Roberts: > Nagging is one way to accomplish change, but it's sure annoying.
Right. I was a little too much nervous, sometimes I need to control myself a little more :-) > If you feel the feature is import, you know where to get the source. Give it > a shot. There is already a partial patch. And modifying just my own version of D is less than useless. > Contribution of code is oh so much more valuable than a constant stream of > "you > should change..." Right. > Repeatedly claiming that Walter ignores 'X' is another way to get a reaction, > but it's also very annoying. You're far from the only person to pull this > card > out. Do you _honestly_ believe he's that narrow minded or are you just trying > to get enough of a rise out of such claims that he'll drop what he's doing and > focus on your nag-of-the-day? I don't fully understand you. He sometimes ignores 'X', but he's busy, so I don't expect him to know everything. This is why I have written this and other posts, to not let this X be ignored. I am not asking to remove implicit joining of adjacent strings today, but I'd like this to be considered for future change. > Sigh.. it get's old, fast. I don't understamd this speech figure, sorry. Bye, bearophile