Am 20.11.2010 00:56, schrieb Michael Stover:
so that was 4 months ago - how do things currently stand on that initiative?
-Mike
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Bruno Medeiros
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 19/11/2010 22:25, Michael Stover wrote:
As for D lexers and tokenizers, what would be nice is to
A) build an antlr grammar for D
B) build D targets for antlr so that antlr can generate lexers and
parsers in the D language.
For B) I found http://www.mbutscher.de/antlrd/index.html
For A) A good list of antlr grammars is at
http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list, but there isn't a D grammar.
These things wouldn't be an enormous amount of work to create and
maintain, and, if done, anyone could parse D code in many languages,
including Java and C which would make providing IDE features for D
development easier in those languages (eclipse for instance),
and you
could build lexers and parsers in D using antlr grammars.
-Mike
Yes, that would be much better. It would be directly and immediately
useful for the DDT project:
"But better yet would be to start coding our own custom parser
(using a parser generator like ANTLR for example), that could really
be tailored for IDE needs. In the medium/long term, that's probably
what needs to be done. "
in
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/ide/Future_of_Descent_and_D_Eclipse_IDE_635.html
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
There is a project with an antlr D-grammar in work.
http://code.google.com/p/vs-d-integration/
Maybe this can be finished?
matthias
